Legal document
Consumer Clauses B2C vs B2B
Operator: FIRSTSTONE TRADING spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością (FIRSTSTONE TRADING sp. z o.o.) KRS: 0001254766 | NIP: 7831958614 Registry court: District Court Poznań – Nowe Miasto i Wilda in Poznań, 8th Commercial Division of the National Court Register Registered office: ul. Wierzbięcice 44A/40A, 61-568 Poznań, województwo wielkopolskie Voivodeship Correspondence / Shop service address: ul. Wierzbięcice 44A/40A, 61-568 Poznań (one hundred shares of PLN 50.00 each) Representation: Krystian Dawidowski — Member of the Management Board (sole-member management board, independent representation) e-Delivery electronic address (ADE): AE:PL-21312-60691-FGBFV-19 Legal contact: compliance@purepoint.pl | Shop contact: contact@purepoint.pl
Version: 2.0 Effective date: 6 June 2026 Domain: purepoint.pl
Table of contents
- Purpose of the document — transparency of regime differences
- Definitions
- Comparative clause matrix B2C / PnPK / B2B / NK
- Liability exclusion clauses per regime
- Court jurisdiction clauses
- Governing law clauses
- ADR / ODR — out-of-court dispute resolution
- Bibliography
- Change history
- Final clause
1. Purpose of the document — transparency of regime differences
This document constitutes an internal and publicly made-available comparison sheet whose purpose is full transparency of the clauses applied by the Operator towards the individual categories of buyers of the Products offered in the Shop under the purepoint.pl domain. It supplements the Shop Terms and Conditions, the Privacy Policy and the Returns and Complaints Policy, and serves as a map facilitating the assessment, by both the Buyer and the supervisory authorities (President of the UOKiK, President of the UODO, the Trade Inspection) as well as the common courts, of which specific rights and which liability limitations apply in a given legal relationship.
The Operator takes the position that a transparent and objectively documented map of regime distinctions is one of the most important elements of good market practice in the sector of selling Research Materials (research-grade peptides), since it is precisely in this sector that attempts to circumvent consumer protection by sellers operating cross-border occur most frequently. The Operator deliberately takes the opposite path — it introduces a stricter Qualified Buyer regime, in which a Consumer within the meaning of Art. 22(1) of the Act of 23 April 1964 — the Polish Civil Code (consolidated text: Journal of Laws 2024 item 1061, as amended; hereinafter: KC) is excluded from the group of persons entitled to conclude a Sales Agreement. Consequently, the vast majority of clauses described in the Act of 30 May 2014 on Consumer Rights (consolidated text: Journal of Laws 2024 item 1796, as amended; hereinafter: UPK) [VERIFY — harmonised with the publication reference used in doc. 08; originally Journal of Laws 2020 item 287 was indicated] do not apply; however, the Operator — out of concern for the highest market standard — maintains analogous safeguards in relation to a Sole Trader with Consumer Rights (Art. 385(5) KC and Art. 38a UPK).
This document: 1. explains the differences between four categories of buyers: Consumer, Sole Trader with Consumer Rights (PnPK), Full-Status Trader (B2B), and Qualified Buyer (NK); 2. presents a matrix of the 32 most frequently disputed clauses and their configuration per regime; 3. justifies the legal basis for each of the differences; 4. indicates the applicable EU and national provisions governing court jurisdiction, governing law and ADR/ODR.
2. Definitions
Consumer — a natural person performing with a trader a legal act not directly related to their business or professional activity (Art. 22(1) KC). In the Operator’s Shop, this category is excluded from the possibility of concluding a Sales Agreement, which is a consequence of Art. 124 para. 1 of the Act of 6 September 2001 — Pharmaceutical Law (consolidated text: Journal of Laws 2025 item 750, previously Journal of Laws 2024 item 686, as amended; hereinafter: PF), pursuant to which whoever places a medicinal product on the market without the required authorisation shall be subject to a fine, the penalty of restriction of liberty, or imprisonment for up to 2 years. The Products offered by the Operator are not medicinal products within the meaning of Art. 2 point 32 PF, and therefore their sale to a person without a professional or research context could be regarded as an act burdened with disproportionate reputational and legal risk.
Trader — a natural person, legal person, or organisational unit referred to in Art. 33(1) KC that conducts business or professional activity in its own name (Art. 43(1) KC).
Sole Trader with Consumer Rights (PnPK) — a natural person concluding an agreement directly related to their business activity where it follows from the content of that agreement that it does not have a professional character for them, resulting in particular from the subject matter of the business activity they perform, made available pursuant to the provisions on the Central Register and Information on Business Activity. This status is granted jointly by Art. 385(5) KC, Art. 556(4) KC, Art. 556(5) KC and Art. 576(5) KC, and as regards the right of withdrawal and information obligations — by Art. 38a UPK.
Qualified Buyer (NK) — within the meaning of the Shop Terms and Conditions (§ 4 — Qualified Buyer Status) a natural person, legal person, or organisational unit referred to in Art. 33(1) KC, acquiring Products for a purpose connected with conducted business, professional, research or academic activity (Art. 43(1) KC), excluding a Consumer (Art. 22(1) KC), who has submitted a Qualified Profile Declaration (KOP) and has been classified into one of five categories: STUDENT (biomedical fields, chemistry, biotechnology, pharmacy), LAB (NIP + laboratory name), SCIENTIST (ORCID or scientific institution), BIZ_RD (NIP + PKD 74.10.Z / 72.11.Z / 72.19.Z / 72.20.Z / 21.20.Z) or OTHER_PRO (declaration exceeding 100 characters, manual verification).
Qualified Profile Declaration (KOP) — a set of 5 compliance declarations, the Qualified Buyer category and supplementary data, submitted before the first Sales Agreement and subject to verification by the Operator. The KOP extends the standard consumer declarations with declarations regarding the Product’s intended use exclusively for in vitro research purposes, as well as awareness that the Product is not a medicinal product, dietary supplement, cosmetic, or any other product intended for ingestion, injection, or application to the human or animal body.
Operator — FIRSTSTONE TRADING spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością with its registered office in Poznań (ul. Wierzbięcice 44A/40A, 61-568 Poznań, województwo wielkopolskie), entered into the register of entrepreneurs of the National Court Register under number KRS 0001254766 by the District Court Poznań – Nowe Miasto i Wilda in Poznań, 8th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, NIP: 7831958614
Shop — the Operator’s sales platform available under the purepoint.pl domain, serving the conclusion of Sales Agreements for Products (Research Materials) exclusively with Qualified Buyers.
Product / Research Material — a research-grade peptide or other chemical compound intended exclusively for in vitro scientific research, offered in the Shop. The Product is not a medicinal product (Art. 2 point 32 PF), a dietary supplement, a cosmetic, a medical device, or a food product.
Sales Agreement — a contract of sale concluded between the Operator and a Qualified Buyer, on the terms set out in the Shop Terms and Conditions.
3. Comparative clause matrix B2C / PnPK / B2B / NK
The table below presents, in a synthetic manner, the configuration of 32 model clauses for four regimes. The B2C column reflects the consumer market standard — the Operator deliberately cites it, even though it does not apply it in practice (Consumers are excluded). The PnPK column reflects the regime that the Operator applies towards natural persons conducting business activity where it follows from the content of the agreement that it lacks a professional character. The B2B column — a full-status trader. The NK column — a Qualified Buyer within the meaning of the Shop Terms and Conditions (stricter research regime).
Legend: ✓ = applies / is applied; ✗ = does not apply / excluded; ◐ = applies to a limited extent; n/a = not applicable.
| No. | Clause / Right | Legal basis | B2C | PnPK | B2B | NK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Right of withdrawal from the agreement within 14 days without giving a reason | Art. 27 UPK | ✓ | ✓ (Art. 38a UPK) | ✗ | ✗ (Art. 38 points 3, 4, 5 UPK + Art. 22(1) KC a contrario) |
| 2 | Exceptions to the right of withdrawal (including non-prefabricated goods, goods liable to deteriorate rapidly, sealed goods) | Art. 38 points 3, 4, 5 UPK | ✓ | ✓ | n/a | ✓ (fallback argument) |
| 3 | Statutory warranty for physical and legal defects | Art. 556–576 KC | ✓ (2 years) | ✓ (2 years) | ✓ (excluded under Art. 558 § 1 KC) | ◐ (excluded under Art. 558 § 1 KC, voluntary COA inspection) |
| 4 | Presumption that the defect existed at the time of delivery | Art. 556(2) KC (1 year for consumers) | ✓ (1 year) | ✓ (1 year) | ✗ | ✗ |
| 5 | Prohibited contractual provisions (abusive clauses) | Art. 384–385(4) KC | ✓ | ✓ (Art. 385(5) KC) | ✗ | ✗ |
| 6 | Pre-contractual information obligation (12 items) | Art. 12 UPK | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ◐ (abridged, adapted to the KOP) |
| 7 | Cap on the Operator’s liability (monetary limit) | Art. 473 § 1 KC, Art. 558 § 1 KC | ✗ (prohibited) | ✗ (prohibited) | ✓ (up to the order value + shipping) | ✓ (up to the order value + shipping) |
| 8 | Exclusion of lucrum cessans (lost profits) | Art. 361 § 2 KC, Art. 473 § 1 KC | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 9 | Exclusion of liability for indirect damage | Art. 361 § 2 KC | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 10 | Jurisdiction of the court competent for the Operator’s registered office | Art. 1104 KPC + Art. 25 Brussels I bis | ✗ (consumer — Art. 31–32 KPC, Art. 18 Brussels I bis) | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 11 | Governing law — choice of Polish law | Art. 6 para. 2 Rome I 593/2008 | ◐ (with the limitation of the overriding mandatory provisions of the consumer’s country of residence) | ◐ | ✓ (free choice, Art. 3 Rome I) | ✓ (free choice — Polish) |
| 12 | ADR — out-of-court resolution of consumer disputes | Act of 23 September 2016 on out-of-court resolution of consumer disputes, Journal of Laws 2016 item 1823 | ✓ (WSIH, RPK) | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| 13 | ODR — EU platform (https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/) | Regulation 524/2013 | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| 14 | VAT-RR invoice (flat-rate farmer) | Art. 116 of the Act of 11 March 2004 on VAT | n/a | n/a | ◐ (exclusively for farmers) | ✗ |
| 15 | Invoice under the margin scheme / VAT-margin | Art. 120 of the VAT Act | n/a | n/a | ◐ | ✗ |
| 16 | Pro forma invoice (order with prepayment) | market practice, Art. 106b para. 1 of the VAT Act | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (NK standard — pro forma + prepayment) |
| 17 | Deferred transfer (trade credit) | Art. 488 § 2 KC | ✗ | ✗ | ◐ (on a case-by-case basis) | ◐ (after 6 documented orders + scoring) |
| 18 | Liability period / time limit for asserting claims under the statutory warranty | Art. 568 KC [VERIFY — Art. 568 § 1 KC provides for a 2-year liability period for movable things; the value of “6 years” refers to limitation (Art. 118 / Art. 568 § 2–3 KC) and requires clarification] | 2 years of liability / limitation under Art. 568 § 2–3 KC | 2 years | 1 year from delivery (contractually) | 1 year from delivery (contractually) |
| 19 | Time limit for the Operator’s response to a complaint | Art. 7a para. 1 UPK (14 days) | 14 days | 14 days | 30 days (contractually) | 30 days (contractually) |
| 20 | Obligation to provide COA (Certificate of Analysis) documentation | good GMP practice, Art. 471 KC | n/a | n/a | ◐ (on request) | ✓ (NK standard — COA per LOT on request) |
| 21 | Obligation to retain the COA for 6 years | Art. 74 of the Accounting Act (by analogy) | n/a | n/a | n/a | ✓ (Operator’s undertaking) |
| 22 | Severability clause | Art. 58 § 3 KC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 23 | Rebus sic stantibus clause | Art. 357(1) KC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 24 | Electronic form of the agreement | Art. 78(1) KC, eIDAS 910/2014 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 25 | Identity card / identity verification | Art. 38–39 of the Act of 1 March 2018 on counteracting money laundering (Journal of Laws [VERIFY — inconsistent publication reference in doc. v2], AML) | ✗ (up to EUR 5k) | ✗ (up to EUR 5k) | ◐ (>EUR 15k) | ✓ (KOP + thresholds of EUR 5k / 15k / 50k — proactively) |
| 26 | Marketing consent for commercial communication | Art. 10 of the Act of 18 July 2002 on the provision of services by electronic means | required | required | required | required (separate KOP checkbox) |
| 27 | Consent to analytical / marketing cookies | Art. 173 of the Telecommunications Law + UODO decision 02/2025 | required (symmetrical banner) | required | required | required (Plausible — no cookies, no banner) |
| 28 | Consent to profiling / automated decision-making | Art. 22 GDPR 2016/679 | required | required | required | required (manual review OTHER_PRO) |
| 29 | Right to be forgotten | Art. 17 GDPR | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (except for accounting obligations) | ✓ (except for Art. 74 of the Accounting Act + 6 years AML) |
| 30 | Geo-block — exclusion of sales to specified jurisdictions (RU/BY/IR/KP/SY/CU/VE/MM) | Regulations 269/2014, 833/2014, 765/2006; Act of 13 April 2022 on special measures to counteract support for aggression against Ukraine (Journal of Laws 2022 item 835) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (hard exclusion in the KOP) |
| 31 | Clause on sanctions for a false KOP declaration | Art. 233 KK (up to 8 years) + Art. 471 KC | n/a | n/a | n/a | ✓ |
| 32 | No medical claims clause (prohibition on formulating medical claims) | Art. 124 para. 1 PF; Act of 23 August 2007 on counteracting unfair market practices | n/a | n/a | n/a | ✓ (undertaking of the Operator + NK) |
Total: 32 clauses in an unambiguous matrix. Each item reflects the actual configuration applied by the Operator — this is not a marketing declaration, but an operational map of application.
4. Liability exclusion clauses per regime
4.1. Consumer regime (B2C) — not applied in the Shop
The Operator does not conclude Sales Agreements with Consumers. If, however — as a result of a KOP verification error or a false declaration on the part of the Buyer — such an Agreement were to be concluded, the mandatory provisions of Art. 27–39 UPK and Art. 556–576 KC would apply in full. Any provisions limiting the Operator’s liability towards a Consumer would be deemed prohibited within the meaning of Art. 385(1) KC and would not bind the Consumer. The Operator does not cite the full formulas in this document, as this regime is not the operational regime of the Shop.
4.2. Sole Trader with Consumer Rights (PnPK) regime
For the PnPK, the Operator applies the following formula:
“The Operator shall be liable towards the PnPK under the statutory warranty for physical and legal defects of the Product on the terms set out in Art. 556(4)–576(5) KC, subject to the reservation that this liability does not cover indirect damage, lost profits, or damage resulting from the use of the Product in a manner inconsistent with the research purpose declared by the PnPK or beyond the scope of in vitro applications. The Operator’s aggregate liability is limited to the value of the order in which the defect was disclosed, increased by the shipping costs, unless mandatory provisions of law provide otherwise.”
The Operator deliberately retains the full consumer statutory warranty regime (2 years) towards the PnPK, even though Art. 558 § 1 KC would give the theoretical possibility of excluding it — this is a conscious decision dictated by the market standard and by avoiding the risk of a prohibited provision (Art. 385(5) KC in conjunction with Art. 385(1) KC).
[FOR THE LEGAL COUNSEL — internal contradiction and risk of abusiveness] The formula in § 4.2 above imposes on the PnPK (i) a cap on liability up to the order value + shipping and (ii) an exclusion of lost profits and indirect damage. This is inconsistent with the matrix in § 3, where clause 7 (cap) is marked for the PnPK as ✗ (“prohibited”), and clauses 8–9 (exclusion of lucrum cessans / indirect damage) as ✗ (“does not apply”). Provisions limiting liability towards the PnPK may be subject to abusiveness review (Art. 385(5) in conjunction with Art. 385(1) and 385(3) KC) and may be deemed non-binding. Recommendation: harmonise the formula in § 4.2 with the matrix — towards the PnPK do not apply a monetary cap or an exclusion of lucrum cessans, limiting the reservations to cases of use of the Product inconsistent with the declared research purpose. A directional decision requires the legal counsel’s approval.
4.3. B2B regime (full-status trader)
For B2B, the Operator applies a formula of full exclusion of the statutory warranty on the basis of Art. 558 § 1 KC:
“The Parties jointly exclude the Operator’s liability under the statutory warranty for physical and legal defects of the Product (Art. 558 § 1 KC). The Operator retains liability for damage caused through wilful misconduct. The Operator’s aggregate liability towards the Buyer is limited to the value of the order (net) increased by documented shipping costs. The Operator shall not be liable for lost profits (lucrum cessans), indirect damage, reputational damage, damage resulting from research downtime, damage resulting from a delay in scientific publication, or other consequential damage.”
The exclusion of lucrum cessans is based on Art. 361 § 2 KC in conjunction with Art. 473 § 1 KC and is permissible in B2B relations, provided that it does not concern damage caused intentionally.
4.4. Qualified Buyer (NK) regime — Shop standard
For the NK, the Operator applies a formula identical to B2B (cap + exclusion of lucrum cessans), supplemented by an undertaking to provide a COA per LOT on request, retention of documentation for 6 years (by analogy to Art. 74 of the Act of 29 September 1994 on Accounting), and a clause on sanctions for a false KOP declaration (Art. 233 KK + Art. 471 KC).
Operational formula:
“The Operator shall be liable solely for actual damage (damnum emergens) caused through wilful misconduct or gross negligence, up to the aggregate amount of the order value increased by the shipping costs. The Operator shall not be liable for lost profits, indirect damage, or damage arising from the use of the Product inconsistent with its research purpose. The Qualified Buyer bears full responsibility for the truthfulness of the Qualified Profile Declaration (KOP). The submission of a false declaration in the KOP exposes the Buyer to criminal liability under Art. 233 KK (up to 8 years) and civil-law liability under Art. 471 KC.”
5. Court jurisdiction clauses
5.1. Consumer (B2C) — not applied
In relation to a Consumer, jurisdiction is mandatorily determined in Art. 17–19 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I bis) — a consumer may sue a trader before the court of their place of residence, and a trader may sue a consumer exclusively before the court of the consumer’s place of residence. At the national level, protection is supplemented by Art. 31–32 of the Act of 17 November 1964 — the Code of Civil Procedure (consolidated text: Journal of Laws 2024 item 1568, as amended; hereinafter: KPC).
5.2. PnPK
For the PnPK, the Operator does not apply a prorogation clause — the competent court is determined according to the general rules of the KPC (Art. 27 KPC — actor sequitur forum rei).
5.3. B2B and NK
For B2B and NK, the Operator applies a prorogation clause:
“Any disputes arising from or related to the Sales Agreement shall be resolved by the common court having local jurisdiction over the Operator’s registered office (the District Court Poznań – Nowe Miasto i Wilda in Poznań or the Regional Court in Gdańsk — depending on the value of the subject matter of the dispute). In cross-border relations within the European Union, Art. 25 of the Brussels I bis Regulation (1215/2012) applies, on the basis of which the Parties make a choice of the jurisdiction of the Polish courts.”
This clause is effective in professional trade (B2B) on the basis of Art. 1104 KPC and Art. 25 Brussels I bis. Towards the NK, its effectiveness is based on the fact that the NK, by its definition, is not a Consumer (Art. 17 Brussels I bis does not apply).
6. Governing law clauses
6.1. Consumer — Rome I Art. 6
Pursuant to Art. 6 para. 1 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) — a consumer contract is governed by the law of the country in which the consumer has their habitual residence, provided that the trader pursues its activities in that country or directs them to that country. A choice of law (Art. 6 para. 2 Rome I) may not deprive the consumer of the protection of the mandatory provisions of the law of their habitual residence. In the Shop, this regime has no operational application (Consumers are excluded).
6.2. PnPK, B2B, NK — Rome I Art. 3
For the PnPK, B2B and NK, the Operator applies a clause choosing Polish law:
“The Parties, on the basis of Art. 3 of the Rome I Regulation (593/2008), make a choice of Polish law as the law governing the Sales Agreement and any non-contractual obligations arising from its conclusion, performance or non-performance. In matters not regulated by the Agreement or the Shop Terms and Conditions, the provisions of the KC, the UPK (to the extent that they apply to the PnPK), the Brussels I bis Regulation (1215/2012), the Rome I Regulation (593/2008), and other mandatory provisions of Polish law and European Union law apply.”
The choice of Polish law for the NK is a conscious decision by the Operator — it simplifies the pursuit of claims, facilitates compliance audit, and corresponds with the Operator’s place of business and the place of storage of COA and AML documentation.
7. ADR / ODR — out-of-court dispute resolution
ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) and ODR (Online Dispute Resolution) are mechanisms of exclusively consumer protection, established on the basis of: – Directive 2013/11/EU on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes (transposed into Polish law by the Act of 23 September 2016 on out-of-court resolution of consumer disputes, Journal of Laws 2016 item 1823); – Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 establishing the ODR platform.
The Operator informs that: – due to the exclusion of Consumers from the Shop (see § 2 Definitions — Consumer; Shop Terms and Conditions § 4), ADR/ODR have no operational application towards Qualified Buyers; – if, however, an Agreement were concluded with a Consumer (e.g. as a result of a false KOP declaration) — the Consumer retains the full right to turn to the entities authorised to conduct ADR, in particular: – the Voivodeship Inspector of the Trade Inspection (WSIH) — list: https://uokik.gov.pl/wazne_adresy.php; – the Consumer Ombudsman (RPK) operating at the district governors (starostas); – the Permanent Consumer Arbitration Court at the WSIH. – the Consumer may make use of the European Commission’s ODR platform available at: https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/.
The Operator indicates its contact e-mail address in the context of ODR: contact@purepoint.pl.
8. Bibliography
Acts of Polish law: – Act of 23 April 1964 — the Polish Civil Code, consolidated text Journal of Laws 2024 item 1061, as amended (KC) — Art. 22(1), 33(1), 43(1), 58, 357(1), 361, 384–385(5), 471, 473, 488, 556–576(5), 558. – Act of 17 November 1964 — the Code of Civil Procedure, consolidated text Journal of Laws 2024 item 1568, as amended (KPC) — Art. 27, 31–32, 1104. – Act of 6 June 1997 — the Penal Code, consolidated text Journal of Laws 2024 item 17, as amended (KK) — Art. 233. – Act of 30 May 2014 on Consumer Rights, consolidated text Journal of Laws 2024 item 1796, as amended (UPK) — Art. 7a, 12, 27–39, 38a. [VERIFY — harmonised with doc. 08; originally Journal of Laws 2020 item 287] – Act of 6 September 2001 — Pharmaceutical Law, consolidated text Journal of Laws 2025 item 750 (previously Journal of Laws 2024 item 686, as amended; PF) — Art. 2 point 32, Art. 124 para. 1. – Act of 11 March 2004 on the Tax on Goods and Services, consolidated text Journal of Laws 2024 item 361, as amended — Art. 106b, 116, 120. – Act of 29 September 1994 on Accounting, consolidated text Journal of Laws 2024 item 619, as amended — Art. 74. – Act of 18 July 2002 on the provision of services by electronic means, consolidated text Journal of Laws 2020 item 344, as amended. – Act of 1 March 2018 on counteracting money laundering and the financing of terrorism, consolidated text Journal of Laws [VERIFY — in the v2 documents three different publication references: 2025 item 419 / 2025 item 124 / 2024 item 197; to be harmonised], as amended (AML). – Act of 23 September 2016 on out-of-court resolution of consumer disputes, Journal of Laws 2016 item 1823. – Act of 13 April 2022 on special measures to counteract support for aggression against Ukraine, Journal of Laws 2022 item 835.
Acts of European Union law: – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data (GDPR) — Art. 17, 22, 37. – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction (Brussels I bis) — Art. 17–19, 25. – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 (Rome I) — Art. 3, 6. – Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of 21 May 2013 on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes (ODR). – Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes. – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 (eIDAS). – Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 (Russia sanctions). – Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 (Russia sectoral sanctions). – Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 (Belarus sanctions).
Decisions and case law: – Decision of the President of the UODO No DKN.5131.02.2025 of 2026 — a fine of EUR 420,000 for an asymmetrical cookie banner; symmetry of the “Accept / Reject / Customise” buttons as a market standard. – Judgment of the CJEU C-311/18 Schrems II of 16 July 2020 — transfers to third countries; justification for the choice of Plausible Insights OÜ (EEA) instead of Google Analytics 4.
9. Change history
| Version | Date | Author | Scope of changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 22 May 2026 | Compliance FIRSTSTONE TRADING | First version of the B2C/B2B clause matrix based on the old consumer template; no Qualified Buyer layer; partially imprecise citation of Art. 124 PF. |
| 1.0 (rev) | 24 May 2026 | Compliance FIRSTSTONE TRADING | Editorial erratum to v1.0 — typographical corrections and the ADR table. |
| 2.0 | 6 June 2026 | Compliance FIRSTSTONE TRADING | Full rewrite for the NK model with the KOP, addition of a 4th matrix column (NK), completion of the 32 items, correction of the citation of Art. 124 para. 1 PF (up to 2 years), update of the Journal of Laws references 2024/2025, integration of the UODO decision 02/2025, introduction of the clause on sanctions for a false KOP declaration (Art. 233 KK + Art. 471 KC), formal establishment of the choice of Polish law (Rome I Art. 3) and the jurisdiction of the court of the Operator’s registered office (Brussels I bis Art. 25). |
10. Final clause
In the scope not regulated by this document, the mandatory provisions of Polish law and European Union law apply. In the event of any interpretation doubts, contact compliance@purepoint.pl.